
Can restrictions be imposed on public functionaries? SC reserves order
PTI, Nov 15, 2022, 1:03 PM IST

Image for representation
The Supreme Court on Tuesday reserved it order on whether restrictions can be imposed on a public functionary’s right to freedom of speech and expression.
A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Justice S A Nazeer heard the arguments of Attorney General R Venkataramani, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and lawyers from other parties on the matter. The bench also comprised Justices B R Gavai, A S Bopanna, V Ramasubramanian, and B V Nagarathna, ”How can we frame a code of conduct for legislators? We would be encroaching into the powers of the legislature and the executive,” Justice Gavai observed.
The attorney general submitted before the bench that any additions or modifications of restrictions to a fundamental right have to come from Parliament as a matter of Constitutional principle.
Mehta said the issue is more of an academic question — of whether a writ can be filed citing Article 21 for action against a particular statement.
A three-judge bench on October 5, 2017 referred the matter to the Constitution bench to adjudicate various issues, including whether a public functionary or a minister can claim freedom of speech while expressing views on sensitive matters.
The need for authoritative pronouncement on the issue arose as there were arguments that a minister could not take a personal view and his statement has to be with government policy.
Udayavani is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest news.
Top News

Related Articles More

India’s unemployment rate rises to 3-month high of 7.8 pc in March: CMIE

Cong leader Navjot Sidhu released from Patiala jail, slams Centre

Some people have given ‘supari’ to dent my image with support from few inside and outside India: PM Modi

Modi Govt weakening environment, forest laws for ease of doing business: Congress

Punjab CM announces Kiratpur Sahib-Nangal-Una Road toll plaza closure, says era of ‘roads on rent’ over