Kissing, fondling boy, 14, not unnatural offence: Bombay High Court
PTI, May 15, 2022, 3:36 PM IST
Credit: Pixaby Photo
Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has observed that kissing on lips and fondling are not unnatural offences under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, and granted bail to a man accused of sexually assaulting a minor boy.
In a recent order, Justice Anuja Prabhudessai granted bail to the man, arrested last year following a police complaint filed by the 14-year-old boy’s father.
As per the FIR, the boy’s father found some money missing from their cupboard. The boy told him that he had given the money to the accused person. The minor said he used to visit the accused person’s shop at a suburb in Mumbai for recharging an online game, ‘Ola Party,’ which he used to play.
One day, when he went to get the recharge, the accused kissed him on the lips and touched his private parts, the boy alleged.
Following this, the boy’s father approached the police who registered an FIR against the accused under relevant sections of the Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and under Indian Penal Code (IPC) Section 377, which makes carnal intercourse or any other unnatural act as a punishable offence.
Notably, IPC Section 377 carries a maximum punishment of life imprisonment and makes grant of bail difficult.
Justice Prabhudessai, while granting bail to the accused, noted that a medical test conducted on the boy did not support his statement of sexual assault.
She further said the POCSO sections imposed against the accused carried a maximum sentence of five years and entitled him for bail.
In the present case, the element of unnatural sex was not prima facie applicable, Justice Prabhudessai said.
“The statement of the victim as well as the First Information Report (FIR) prima facie indicate that the applicant had touched the private parts of the victim and kissed his lips. In my considered view, this would not prima facie constitute offence under section 377 of the Indian Penal Code,” the judge said.
The high court further noted that the accused had already been in custody for a year, and the trial in the case was not likely to begin soon.
“Considering the above facts and circumstances, the applicant is entitled for bail,” the high court said, while granting bail to the accused on a personal bond of ₹ 30,000.
Udayavani is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest news.
Top News
Related Articles More
DRDO develops country’s lightest bulletproof jacket for protection against highest threat level
LS Polls 2024: Modi does not do politics on religion basis, says Rajnath Singh
Delhi court extends judicial custody of Arvind Kejriwal till May 7
Lashkar terrorist behind government employee’s killing in Rajouri: J&K Cops
Kharge attacks PM Modi over his remarks about Congress manifesto
MUST WATCH
Latest Additions
What role does genetics play in breast cancer? How can genetic testing help with early breast cancer diagnosis?
Naxal activity cools following ANF operations?
Preparations complete for Lok Sabha Elections in Dakshina Kannada
Building the future: Chowta’s ‘Navayuga Navpatha’ manifesto sets ambitious goals for DK
Hope to see my protege Padmaraj’s victory in my lifetime: Janardhana Poojary