Udayavni Special

Wadia’s defamation case fallout of corporate dispute: Ratan Tata


PTI, Apr 18, 2019, 3:43 PM IST

Mumbai: Tata Sons former chairman Ratan Tata told the Bombay High Court Thursday that the defamation case filed against him and other directors of the group by industrialist Nusli Wadia was because of the fallout of a corporate dispute.

Ratan Tata and the other directors earlier approached the high court, seeking to quash and stay the proceedings initiated against them by a magistrate court in the 2016 criminal defamation case filed by Nusli Wadia.

In December 2018, a magistrate court in the city issued notices to Ratan Tata and other directors of Tata Sons in the criminal defamation case filed by Wadia in 2016, after he was voted out of the boards of some Tata Group companies.

Senior counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Ratan Tata, on Thursday told a division bench of Justices Ranjit More and Bharati Dangre that the entire case was filed with complete non-application of mind.

“The case is only a fallout of a corporate dispute between Ratan Tata and Nusli Wadia, who is a strong supporter of Cyrus Mistry (former group chairman of Tata Sons),” Singhvi told the court.

He further argued that what the complainant, Wadia, has termed as defamatory is wrong and not “defamatory per se”.

“The November 2016 letters and minutes of meeting that was circulated by Tata Sons to its group companies only sought for Wadia’s removal as he was acting against the company’s interest,” Singhvi said.

After hearing brief arguments, the bench posted the petition for further hearing on June 10.

Wadia in his complaint before the magistrate claimed that Ratan Tata and others made defamatory statements against him after they removed Cyrus Mistry on October 24, 2016 as the group chairman of Tata Sons.

Wadia was on the boards as an independent director of group companies like Indian Hotels Company that runs the Taj group of hotels, TCS, Tata Motors and Tata Steel, among others.

He was voted out by shareholders at a specially convened general meeting between December 2016 and February 2017.

Wadia said he approached the magistrate’s court as he was not satisfied with the explanation the respondents (Ratan Tata and others) had given him following his letters to them.

He, therefore, initiated defamation proceedings against Ratan Tata and others under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code.

Top News

IISc completes ICU-grade ventilator prototype

PM launches portal to help, hand-hold MSMEs

Udupi: Highest single day spike of 73 new COVID-19 cases

70% of people want Modi to be PM for another term: BSY

Violence against healthcare personnel unacceptable: PM

PM Modi praises state govt’s efforts in handling COVID crisis

Govt’s locust control policy focuses on chemical spray alone: Farm expert

Related Articles More

Enhancement of MSME’s turnover limit to help exporters

PM launches portal to help, hand-hold MSMEs

COVID-19 impact: Top 100 Indian firms likely to lose $25B of brand value

Centre launches micro-credit scheme to provide loans to street vendors

Unlock 1.0: Hotel stocks spike up as Govt lifts curbs on operations from June 8

MUST WATCH

Tragedy and chaos: Former MIA director recalls Mangalore Air Crash

Lockdown relaxation: Long queues outside liquor stores in Mangaluru

Indian Coast Guard thank Covid-19 warriors

#WeFeed – Feeding stray animals during lockdown!

Mysuru-origin doctor honoured with parade for her service in treating COVID-19 patients in US

Latest Additions

Enhancement of MSME’s turnover limit to help exporters

IISc completes ICU-grade ventilator prototype

PM launches portal to help, hand-hold MSMEs

COVID-19 impact: Top 100 Indian firms likely to lose $25B of brand value

Udupi: DC warns of strict action on traffic rules violations

Thanks for visiting Udayavani

You seem to have an Ad Blocker on.
To continue reading, please turn it off or whitelist Udayavani.