K’taka HC says agreement for adoption of unborn child is for money


Team Udayavani, Dec 10, 2022, 12:52 PM IST

Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court has dismissed a joint plea filed by both, the biological and adoptive parents of a 2 years and nine months old girl child and said that an ‘agreement for adoption’ of an unborn child is unknown to law.

The court also termed it as ‘adoption for money’

The Hindu biological parents and the Muslim adoptive parents had approached the High Court after their plea seeking custody of the child from a childcare unit had been turned down by the Udupi district court.

A division bench comprising Justice B. Veerappa and Justice K.S. Hemalekha observed that the right to life of an unborn shall also be considered as one falling within the scope of Article 21 of the Constitution, and upheld the Udupi District Child Protection Unit’s (DCPU) move to register a criminal case against both, the adoptive as well as the biological parents. The DCPU had contended that the child was exchanged illegally for in return for money.

The court also ruled the ‘agreement’ as invalid even under the Mohammedan law, since the ‘agreement’ was entered between Muslim and non-Muslim parents.

Noting that the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 can protect the welfare of a child whose parents are unable to take care of their children due to financial constraints, the High Court bench stated that the ‘agreement’ cannot be sustained.

While the child was born on March 26, 2020, the two couples had signed the ‘unregistered agreement for adoption’ on March 21, 2020.

They had entered into the agreement as the biological parents were too poor to care for their unborn child.

Thereafter, the adoptive parents, who are childless had brought up the child as their own. However, the child’s custody was handed over to a child care unit by the DCPU who had lodged a complaint in 2021.

The adoptive parents, supported by the biological parents had then moved the district court seeking the child’s custody along with a plea to declare them as guardians of the minor child. However, their plea was rejected by the district court.

 

 

(With inputs from IANS)

Udayavani is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest news.

Top News

Heavy Rainfall: Red alert issued for 6 districts in Karnataka including DK and Udupi

Holding Pak responsible for terror not sufficient, need to go for self-introspection: Jitendra Singh

Assembly bypolls: INDIA bloc win big with 10 seats, BJP bags 2, Independent 1

India crush Zimbabwe by 10 wickets in 4th T20I, take unassailable 3-1 series lead

Satellite images suggest architectural wealth beneath Mahabodhi temple in Bodh Gaya: Officials

Jammu & Kashmir political parties oppose Centre’s move to give more powers to Lt Guv

Rajnath Singh discharged from AIIMS

Related Articles More

Mangaluru: Minister Lakshmi Hebbalkar pays surprise visit to MSPC

Heavy Rainfall: Red alert issued for 6 districts in Karnataka including DK and Udupi

Mangaluru: Speaker Khader gets stuck in traffic, Directs officials to take steps to ease congestion

Mangaluru: BJP holds massive protest condemning FIR against MLA Bharath Shetty

CBI, ED should not become ‘political weapons’: Karnataka Home Minister on Nagendra arrest

MUST WATCH

Elephant attack

Anant Ambani Wedding

BJP & Congress members clash

Aparna Vastarey

Kalaripayattu Meenakshi Amma


Latest Additions

Mangaluru: Minister Lakshmi Hebbalkar pays surprise visit to MSPC

Heavy Rainfall: Red alert issued for 6 districts in Karnataka including DK and Udupi

Holding Pak responsible for terror not sufficient, need to go for self-introspection: Jitendra Singh

Teaching law in regional languages can improve access to legal system: CJI

UP bride calls off wedding after guests argue over sitting in front of cooler

Thanks for visiting Udayavani

You seem to have an Ad Blocker on.
To continue reading, please turn it off or whitelist Udayavani.