Kissing, fondling boy, 14, not unnatural offence: Bombay High Court
PTI, May 15, 2022, 3:36 PM IST
Credit: Pixaby Photo
Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has observed that kissing on lips and fondling are not unnatural offences under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, and granted bail to a man accused of sexually assaulting a minor boy.
In a recent order, Justice Anuja Prabhudessai granted bail to the man, arrested last year following a police complaint filed by the 14-year-old boy’s father.
As per the FIR, the boy’s father found some money missing from their cupboard. The boy told him that he had given the money to the accused person. The minor said he used to visit the accused person’s shop at a suburb in Mumbai for recharging an online game, ‘Ola Party,’ which he used to play.
One day, when he went to get the recharge, the accused kissed him on the lips and touched his private parts, the boy alleged.
Following this, the boy’s father approached the police who registered an FIR against the accused under relevant sections of the Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and under Indian Penal Code (IPC) Section 377, which makes carnal intercourse or any other unnatural act as a punishable offence.
Notably, IPC Section 377 carries a maximum punishment of life imprisonment and makes grant of bail difficult.
Justice Prabhudessai, while granting bail to the accused, noted that a medical test conducted on the boy did not support his statement of sexual assault.
She further said the POCSO sections imposed against the accused carried a maximum sentence of five years and entitled him for bail.
In the present case, the element of unnatural sex was not prima facie applicable, Justice Prabhudessai said.
“The statement of the victim as well as the First Information Report (FIR) prima facie indicate that the applicant had touched the private parts of the victim and kissed his lips. In my considered view, this would not prima facie constitute offence under section 377 of the Indian Penal Code,” the judge said.
The high court further noted that the accused had already been in custody for a year, and the trial in the case was not likely to begin soon.
“Considering the above facts and circumstances, the applicant is entitled for bail,” the high court said, while granting bail to the accused on a personal bond of ₹ 30,000.
Udayavani is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest news.
Top News
Related Articles More
NEET: ‘Incorrect distribution’ of papers at Rajasthan centre, exam reconducted for 120 candidates
AICC spokesperson Radhika Khera resigns over ‘injustice’ in party, invokes Lord Ram
Rahul answers why he always wears white T-shirt
Woman delivers child inside hostel bathroom in Kerala’s Kochi, taken to hospital
CISCE Class 10, 12 results on Monday; board to discontinue compartment exams
MUST WATCH
Latest Additions
We were 15-20 runs short but did not bowl any loose balls: Ravindra Jadeja
NEET: ‘Incorrect distribution’ of papers at Rajasthan centre, exam reconducted for 120 candidates
Dandeli: Woman throws speech-disabled child into crocodile-infested river
Abduction allegations in ‘sexual abuse’ case: My arrest a political conspiracy, claims H D Revanna
Karnataka sex scandal: Congress asks PM Modi to break his ‘silence’